BBC BASIC for Windows
« One last question to be back running.... »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 5th, 2018, 10:44pm



ATTENTION MEMBERS: Conforums will be closing it doors and discontinuing its service on April 15, 2018.
Ad-Free has been deactivated. Outstanding Ad-Free credits will be reimbursed to respective payment methods.

If you require a dump of the post on your message board, please come to the support board and request it.


Thank you Conforums members.

BBC BASIC for Windows Resources
Online BBC BASIC for Windows documentation
BBC BASIC for Windows Beginners' Tutorial
BBC BASIC Home Page
BBC BASIC on Rosetta Code
BBC BASIC discussion group
BBC BASIC for Windows Programmers' Reference

« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
 thread  Author  Topic: One last question to be back running....  (Read 653 times)
Yshua
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 6
xx One last question to be back running....
« Thread started on: Jul 15th, 2015, 10:03pm »

Dearest Richard and forum members:

Am doing great with the program with WMI and alphanumeric descriptions, thanks again.

Do you have the latest 5.96 version of download? And also the secure.exe which you had given out? Was only able to get 5.95a version with the updates....

Thanks for BBC BASIC lifesaving,
Yshua smiley
User IP Logged

rtr2
Guest
xx Re: One last question to be back running....
« Reply #1 on: Jul 16th, 2015, 09:04am »

on Jul 15th, 2015, 10:03pm, Yshua wrote:
Do you have the latest 5.96 version of download?

There's no such version (and unlikely ever to be)! The only versions available as an upgrade/downgrade are 5.95a (UPGRADE5.EXE) and 6.00a (UPGRADE.EXE).

Quote:
And also the secure.exe which you had given out?

'Secured' executables don't run in recent versions of Windows, and I was not able to fix the issue, so the utility is no longer available.

Richard.
User IP Logged

Yshua
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 6
xx Re: One last question to be back running....
« Reply #2 on: Jul 18th, 2015, 6:30pm »

Dearest Richard:

Am only using my Windows XP pc offline to generate my secure.exe code, so would you please just let me have the old, XP version? Thieves struck once on my pc's, then on my blasted thumb drives in a backpack! They tried to deliver a knockout punch to me....

Please help me just get back where I was,
Yshua sad
User IP Logged

rtr2
Guest
xx Re: One last question to be back running....
« Reply #3 on: Jul 18th, 2015, 8:40pm »

on Jul 18th, 2015, 6:30pm, Yshua wrote:
would you please just let me have the old, XP version?

The 'secure' utility only ever worked with the specific version of BB4W for which it was configured, and I never attempted to make a version for v5.95a or v6.00a. The utility is now discontinued and unavailable, sorry.

Richard.
User IP Logged

Yshua
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 6
xx Re: One last question to be back running....
« Reply #4 on: Jul 19th, 2015, 2:02pm »

Dear Richard:

I swear it was running ON MY SYSTEM the last time it was up and running. And my system can use 5.94 without a problem! Please let me use it off line from the internet and I will bless you and find a way to recompense you!

Sorry, but a lot rides on this,
Yshua
User IP Logged

rtr2
Guest
xx Re: One last question to be back running....
« Reply #5 on: Jul 19th, 2015, 2:55pm »

on Jul 19th, 2015, 2:02pm, Yshua wrote:
And my system can use 5.94 without a problem!

The only current, supported, versions of BB4W are v5.95a and v6.00a. v5.94a is obsolete, unsupported and unavailable.

Quote:
Sorry, but a lot rides on this

The 'secure' utility was developed to placate a paranoid BB4W user (not you) who felt that the risk of somebody reverse-engineering his programs was too great. It attempted to prevent a debugger being able to examine the contents of memory - something a debugger is supposed to be able to do! This was only possible because of an 'accidental' feature of Windows, which has probably since been fixed thus making the utility worthless anyway.

Standard BB4W executables are adequately secure against all but the most determined hackers, so long as you enable the 'Encrypt & compress' option (which is enabled by default).

Richard.
User IP Logged

Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls