Author |
Topic: Micromanagement (Read 179 times) |
|
ady
Junior Member
member is offline
Posts: 55
|
 |
Micromanagement
« Thread started on: Dec 19th, 2013, 12:05am » |
|
Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary defines[3] micromanagement as "manage[ment] especially with excessive control or attention on details". Dictionary.com defines micromanagement as "manage[ment] or control with excessive attention to minor details".[4] The online dictionary Encarta defined micromanagement as "atten[tion] to small details in management: control [of] a person or a situation by paying extreme attention to small details".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micromanagement
|
|
 Logged
|
|
|
|
ady
Junior Member
member is offline
Posts: 55
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #1 on: Dec 19th, 2013, 12:06am » |
|
Anyone know why this old git is postng this?
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ady
Junior Member
member is offline
Posts: 55
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #2 on: Dec 19th, 2013, 12:12am » |
|
The conundrum is...
...How do you approach a bit of a genius without being confrontational...
Alternative logical example being, Liberty Basic
|
| « Last Edit: Dec 19th, 2013, 12:13am by ady » |
Logged
|
|
|
|
ady
Junior Member
member is offline
Posts: 55
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #3 on: Dec 19th, 2013, 12:18am » |
|
Not a challenge.
A logical reason why things are at the stage they are at
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
admin
Administrator
member is offline
Posts: 1145
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #4 on: Dec 19th, 2013, 08:35am » |
|
on Dec 19th, 2013, 12:18am, ady wrote:| Not a challenge. A logical reason why things are at the stage they are at |
|
Thank you for your advice. I had already reached the same conclusion. If anybody wants to take over the administration of this forum, please contact me privately.
Richard.
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ady
Junior Member
member is offline
Posts: 55
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #5 on: Dec 19th, 2013, 10:36am » |
|
If there's one thing I have learned over the last 50 years, it's that any moron can criticise
Criticism is the easiest job in the entire universe
If someone else admined the Forum would you still support it with your expertise and knowledge?
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
admin
Administrator
member is offline
Posts: 1145
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #6 on: Dec 19th, 2013, 10:59am » |
|
on Dec 19th, 2013, 10:36am, ady wrote:| If someone else admined the Forum would you still support it with your expertise and knowledge? |
|
Who's to say the new admin would even allow me to be a member? I'm not sure I'd want to be. 
Richard.
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ady
Junior Member
member is offline
Posts: 55
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #7 on: Dec 19th, 2013, 11:22am » |
|
I would happily do it as my contribution to keeping BB4W going but it's your baby, only you have the in-depth-expertise for advanced users
The general board would be more of a free-for-all zone and searching for info would be possible without logging in
Does that sound reasonable?
Have a think about it
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
admin
Administrator
member is offline
Posts: 1145
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #8 on: Dec 19th, 2013, 12:42pm » |
|
on Dec 19th, 2013, 11:22am, ady wrote:| only you have the in-depth-expertise for advanced users |
|
I don't think I have much "in-depth expertise" that hasn't already been recorded in the Wiki and elsewhere.
Edit:
Quote:| searching for info would be possible without logging in |
|
It is at the moment. Guests can search the forum.
Quote:
I will. If we go down that route I would want to retain a place to make announcements, so it would probably be my intention to use the old Yahoo group for that. That's exactly the situation with Liberty BASIC: Carl administers the Yahoo group but the Conforums board is run by enthusiasts.
I'd be interested to learn from other members whether they agree with your analysis.
Richard.
|
| « Last Edit: Dec 19th, 2013, 1:39pm by admin » |
Logged
|
|
|
|
Richey
New Member
member is offline
Gender: 
Posts: 35
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #9 on: Dec 19th, 2013, 11:04pm » |
|
I'm not sure about this...
Liberty BASIC has a very active community plus there are several moderators who are very involved and appear to be experienced and knowledgeable programmers. Moreover, the moderators are very committed to Liberty BASIC and spend a lot of time on the forum contributing or helping others out with their queries; that is, Carl can afford to let others take the lead.
I'm not sure that is the case with BB4W. Are there sufficient numbers of people out there willing to be moderators who have the time, commitment, knowledge and experience to support Richard?
Maybe if Richard took more of a back seat others would come forward and fill the gap and the community would develop? God knows Richard deserves a break but would sufficient people of the right calibre would come forward to make it happen?
In any case, if this did happen I see no reason for Richard not to continue as a moderator (if he wants to) if others come forward to join him? Carl is still included as a moderator on the LB conforum; even if he doesn't need to reply / contribute to the discussions (because others do so) he still has the option to do so should he so wish. 
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
admin
Administrator
member is offline
Posts: 1145
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #10 on: Dec 19th, 2013, 11:46pm » |
|
on Dec 19th, 2013, 11:04pm, Richey wrote:| I'm not sure that is the case with BB4W. Are there sufficient numbers of people out there willing to be moderators who have the time, commitment, knowledge and experience to support Richard? |
|
I think you've hit the nail on the head there. From a sheer numerical standpoint I am reasonably sure there are many more active Liberty BASIC users than BBC BASIC users, so the 'pool' from which enthusiastic and knowledgeable moderators can be drawn is larger. There is also, I fear, a 'cultural' difference that can mean BBC BASIC users (who are predominately British) are less inclined to give of their own time to help others.
Quote:| In any case, if this did happen I see no reason for Richard not to continue as a moderator (if he wants to) if others come forward to join him? |
|
I suspect the issue that concerns Ady and others is not so much who has the role of moderator, but who is the owner of the forum and therefore has the power to appoint moderators or even to close it down entirely. In the case of the LB forum Carl is not the owner.
Quote:| he still has the option to do so should he so wish. |
|
But that ability could be withdrawn at any time by Alyce (not that I'm suggesting she would). I do, sadly, have past experience of people who initially seemed to be enthusiastic and supportive, but later turned against BBC BASIC (and me!).
I wonder why this issue has come to a head now. Activity on this forum is low, partly because there are not many active users of BB4W and partly (I hope) because the available documentation is sufficiently good that the answers to most queries can be found without having to ask here. What aspect of my 'micromanagement' is causing so much annoyance?
Richard.
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ady
Junior Member
member is offline
Posts: 55
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #11 on: Dec 20th, 2013, 12:45am » |
|
on Dec 19th, 2013, 11:46pm, Richard Russell wrote:What aspect of my 'micromanagement' is causing so much annoyance?
|
|
Annoyance is the wrong word.
You have a strict style of moderation which I fear could be scaring newer youngsters away, brusque even
A more easy going style is what I would be advocating
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
admin
Administrator
member is offline
Posts: 1145
|
|
Re: Micromanagement
« Reply #12 on: Dec 20th, 2013, 09:30am » |
|
on Dec 20th, 2013, 12:45am, ady wrote:| You have a strict style of moderation which I fear could be scaring newer youngsters away, brusque even |
|
I see. It's pretty clear that in any revised admin arrangement you wouldn't want me to be a moderator, so the approach proposed by Richey isn't going to be acceptable.
Richard.
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
