BBC BASIC for Windows
« Re: online program continued »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 5th, 2018, 11:33pm



ATTENTION MEMBERS: Conforums will be closing it doors and discontinuing its service on April 15, 2018.
Ad-Free has been deactivated. Outstanding Ad-Free credits will be reimbursed to respective payment methods.

If you require a dump of the post on your message board, please come to the support board and request it.


Thank you Conforums members.

BBC BASIC for Windows Resources
Online BBC BASIC for Windows documentation
BBC BASIC for Windows Beginners' Tutorial
BBC BASIC Home Page
BBC BASIC on Rosetta Code
BBC BASIC discussion group
BBC BASIC for Windows Programmers' Reference

« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
 locked  Author  Topic: Re: online program continued  (Read 500 times)
admin
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1145
xx Re: online program continued
« Thread started on: Oct 1st, 2013, 12:54pm »

on Oct 1st, 2013, 12:28pm, MrX wrote:
And what exactly is responsible for cleaning up after a user mode crashed app?
Now let me guess.....oh wait it's the kernel, what a coincidence.

You don't understand. Once the kernel has got to the point of 'cleaning up' the threat is over. The program will have crashed, so there will have been a successful 'denial of service' (DoS), but that's not the primary objective of the attack.

What the attacker is attempting to do by means of a buffer-overflow it to create an exploit that does not result in a crash. Typically he wants to modify the heap or the stack in such a way that control will be transferred to his own code, which can then do anything it likes at the same security level as the program being attacked.

To achieve that he needs to have detailed information about the program, since only by that means can he work out exactly what to store beyond the end of the legitimate buffer to have the desired effect.

Quote:
You really can't admit when you wrong can you?

As I have said before, when I am wrong I am very happy to admit it. The archives of this forum and the Yahoo group prove it, so why make a claim that anybody can easily discover is false?

Richard.
User IP Logged

Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls